Hi, I'm Fuzzy.

This site, Fuzzy's Logic, is a dumping ground for things I find interesting. If you're looking for content I've personally generated you might want to head directly to one of my other sites:

Hi, I'm Fuzzy.

FBI Breaks into iPhone. The EFF Have Some Questions.

If the FBI used a vulnerability to get into the iPhone in the San Bernardino case, the VEP must apply, meaning that there should be a very strong bias in favor of informing Apple of the vulnerability. That would allow Apple to fix the flaw and protect the security of all its users. We look forward to seeing more transparency on this issue as well.


Lebbeus Woods

He envisioned underground cities, floating buildings and an eternal space tomb for Albert Einstein worthy of the great physicist's expansive intellect. With such grand designs, perhaps it's not too surprising that the late Lebbeus Woods, one of the most influential conceptual architects ever to walk the earth, had only one of his wildly imaginative designs become a permanent structure.Instead of working with construction and engineering firms, Woods dreamed up provocative creations that weren't bound by the rules of society or even nature, according to Joseph Becker and Jennifer Dunlop Fletcher, co-curators of a new exhibit at the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art titled Lebbeus Woods, Architect.

Lebbeus Woods

Mordhau Dev Blog

Mordhau is an upcoming medieval first-person fighting game with a strong emphasis on skill-based competitive play. "


The Einstein Tomb

The Einstein Tomb project was created as a memorial to the life and work of Albert Einstein, a symbolic structure in the same spirit as Boullee's Cenotaph to Isaac Newton. Because the self-effacing Einstein--who transformed physics as much as Newton before him--explicitly stated that after his death he wanted no such memorial as a site of veneration, I designed it to be launched into deep space, traveling on a beam of light, never to be seen in terrestrial space and time. However, owing to the gravity-warped structure of space (which Einstein's greatest work--his theory of gravitation--described) it would return to Earth in sidereal time, an infinite number of times, or at least until the end of time and space at the death of the universe.

The Einstein Tomb

The Einstein Tomb

The James Webb Telescope

The James Webb Space Telescope will be a major advance over all previous infrared observatories. Its primary mirror will be 50 times the area of the Spitzer Space Telescope, and its infrared images will have eight times the resolution (about the same resolution in the near-infrared as the Hubble has in the visible spectrum). This will allow the device to capture images of the structure of the first galaxies in the Universe with unprecedented detail. The wavelengths that the Webb will image can not be seen at all from the surface of the Earth because of our atmosphere.

The James Webb Telescope

The Mastermind

He was a brilliant programmer and a vicious cartel boss, who became a prized U.S. government asset. The Atavist Magazine presents a story of an elusive criminal kingpin, told in weekly installments.


Time Machines (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Recent years have seen a growing consensus in the philosophical community that the grandfather paradox and similar logical puzzles do not preclude the possibility of time travel scenarios that utilize spacetimes containing closed timelike curves. At the same time, physicists, who for half a century acknowledged that the general theory of relativity is compatible with such spacetimes, have intensely studied the question whether the operation of a time machine would be admissible in the context of the same theory and of its quantum cousins. A time machine is a device which brings about closed timelike curves--and thus enables time travel--where none would have existed otherwise. The physics literature contains various no-go theorems for time machines, i.e., theorems which purport to establish that, under physically plausible assumptions, the operation of a time machine is impossible. We conclude that for the time being there exists no conclusive no-go theorem against time machines.


Apple mocks good hardware and poor people

At the beginning of Phil Schiller's iPad presentation, Schiller mentions that a lot of users come to iPad from PCs. "This is an amazing statistic," he says with a serious look before revealing that there are more than 600 million PCs in use that are over five years old. "This is really sad." Schiller continues. The audience laughs. "It really is," he says, and tries to continue before being interrupted by more laugher and applause. "These people could really benefit from an iPad Pro," he finishes.

Apple mocks good hardware and poor people

The making of PlayStation VR

Across multiple departments and offices around the world, including help from external partners, Sony's PlayStation VR team spans one of the widest swaths in the game industry. Someone who works on the 3D audio may never meet someone on the display team, or someone in legal, marketing, business development, hardware design or any of the other groups contributing to the headset. PlayStation executive vice president Masayasu Ito estimates that of PlayStation's more than 7,000 employees worldwide, in one form or another, 20 percent have contributed to PlayStation VR.

The making of PlayStation VR

Python 3 is Winning Library Developer Support

Are you using Python 3 for your development? It has been out for 7+ years at this point. So, if you aren't using it, why not? Since December of 2008, the initial release of Python 3, it seems the new version of Python has lived in the shadow of Python 2. And here we are, 7 years later, still looking at a world where people are using Python 2 and talking about how Python 3 doesn't work for them.This made me wonder. Is Python 3 really inferior to Python 2? If not, why aren't people moving? I mean, there has to be a reason people are still clinging to the older technology. After some thought, it seemed to me the most recurring statement for why people are continuing to use Python 2 was "the packages I need just aren't on Python 3''. In attempt to get a statement I believed I could measure I framed this as "is Python 3 supported by library developers well enough for me to move?".

Python 3 is Winning Library Developer Support